SSD NVMe PCIe 4.0 vs SSD NVMe PCIe 3.0 vs SSD SATA III Loading Windows and Games



SSD M.2 NVMe PCIe 3.0 vs SSD M.2 NVMe PCIe 4.0 vs SSD SATA III Win10 / Game Loading Times

Subscribe to my second channel –

Games :
Windows 10 – 0:00
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey – 0:23
Red Dead Redemption 2 – 1:04
Forza Horizon 4 – 1:54
Battlefield V – 2:18
Jedi : Fallen Order – 2:46

All 3 SSDs were almost completely filled (~60GB free of 1TB)

System:
Windows 10 Pro
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 3.6GHz –
MSI MPG X570 Gaming Plus –
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT –
SSD M.2 PCIe 3.0 – Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB –
SSD SATA3 – Samsung 860 Evo-Series 1TB –
SSD M.2 PCIe 4.0 – Gigabyte Aorus NVMe Gen4 SSD 1TB –
32Gb RAM 3600Mhz –

Nguồn: https://spirtavert.com/

Xem thêm bài viết khác: https://spirtavert.com/cong-nghe/

33 thoughts on “SSD NVMe PCIe 4.0 vs SSD NVMe PCIe 3.0 vs SSD SATA III Loading Windows and Games

  1. Games :

    Windows 10 – 0:00

    Assassin's Creed Odyssey – 0:23

    Red Dead Redemption 2 – 1:30

    Forza Horizon 4 – 1:54

    Battlefield V – 2:18

    Jedi : Fallen Order – 2:46

  2. Where these shine is having speeds over HDD's, as well as "file transfer" speeds, there are some good differences. Not as much between each other in the opening of applications, though NVME is definitely a bit better than SATA, though as you all saw, not overly enough to matter.

  3. This video shows us that storage speed is meaningless… Same as that PS5 marketing gimmick of useless 5.5gb/s speed that no game will take advantage of…

  4. Glad I didn't spring for the PCIe 4 drive after seeing this. I'll just wait until it has been out longer and is actually faster I suppose

  5. Why are you calling these PCIe NVMe SSDs? PCIe are the slots for graphics, WiFi, and other peripheral cards. NVMe are extra small slots, of a different format, designed originally for laptops, for special peripherals like certain types of SSDs. They are not one and the same.

  6. I have a Seagate firecuda NVMe PCIe gen 4 drive that fully boots windows 10 in just over 5 seconds.

    And it was only $110. (I did get it on sale though.)

  7. You pay 70 extra dollars for like 1-3 seconds more load time not really worth it unless you have spare cash imo

  8. Planning to upgrade my pc. Motherboard cpu and ssd m.2. Is it wise tobput all triple A games in the gen 3 m.2? Not going for the expensive gen 4. Waste of money i think. Well regards to my question any comments would be great. Oh also would shorten the lige spanbof that m.2 if games are stored in it?

  9. On a computer design level, there isnt much of a difference because most games arent coded to take into consideration SSD speeds. May it be 1000mbps to 5000mpbs, there isn't a specific controller/module that regulates and takes advantage of the speed aside its raw power. Meaning, there will be an average curve for most SSD once it exceeds a certain speed (mbps). This is why Sony is trying to create a specific logical controller for SSD to utilize raw speed in SSD gaming (outside gaming, most of it is utilized for transfer speeds etc)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *